HPYNOSII - Happy Numbers II
The process of “breaking” an integer is defined as summing the squares of its digits. For example, the result of breaking the integer 125 is (12 + 22 + 52) = 30. An integer N is happy if after “breaking” it repeatedly the result reaches 1. If the result never reaches 1 no matter how many times the “breaking” is repeated, then N is not a happy number.
Task
Write a program that given an integer T (number of test cases) and T integers, determines for each number whether it is a happy number or not.
Constraints
1 ≤ T ≤ 1,080,000
2 ≤ N ≤ 2,147,483,647 (number for determining whether it is happy or not)
Input
The first line contains an integer T.
Next T lines contain an integer N for detemining whether it is happy or not.
Output
T lines containing a single integer N which is the number of times the process had to be done to determine that N is happy, or -1 if N is not happy.
Example
Input:
2
19
204
Output:
4
-1
Explanation
First test case:
- 19 : 12 + 92 = 82
- 82 : 82 + 22 = 68
- 68 : 62 + 82 = 100
- 100 : 12 + 02 + 02 = 1
The solution for 19 is 4 because we discovered that the integer 19 is happy after we repeated the process 4 times.
Second test case:
204 → 20 → 4 → 16 → 37 → 58 → 89 → 145 → 42 → 20 → 4 → 16 → 37 → 58 → 89 → 145 ...
204 is not a happy number because after breaking it several times the results start repeating so we can deduce that if we continue breaking it, the result will never reach 1.
hide comments
axe_it:
2012-04-04 21:41:37
i goodled how to take fast input for this problem.. and in c++ we use readint and
|
|
Nilendu Das:
2012-04-04 19:58:39
gets() is much faster than scanf("%s")..
|
|
Somnath Singh :D:
2011-07-01 23:23:02
I have used a little OS concept , Previouly I was using function calls for calculating the squares of the digits , Instead of calling the function better to do it in the main(). Becoz it will take time to stack & unstack . Be caution using printf or puts.
|
|
Santiago Palacio:
2011-04-28 06:05:29
Buda, which IO did you use? |
|
Buda IM (retired):
2011-04-23 23:29:31
Same algo
|
|
hendrik:
2010-12-13 22:07:20
Even though people complained a little about the timeout at the beginning finally it turned out to be a fair limit. |
|
যোবায়ের:
2010-12-13 22:07:20
Instead of tightening time limit, how about tightening source limit... Then I am not going to be able to solve it :D Last edit: 2010-11-14 22:20:25 |
|
Rofael Emil:
2010-12-13 22:07:20
@hendrik ---> navigate to "Happy Numbers II - Trial" in "Tutorial" section
|
|
hendrik:
2010-12-13 22:07:20
Could be an idea to create a copy of this with much larger timeout in the tutorial section. Both I/O and algo matter. So people could experiment a little. |
|
LeppyR64:
2010-12-13 22:07:20
@naive_coder: Yes, I did. |
Added by: | Rofael Emil |
Date: | 2010-11-05 |
Time limit: | 1s |
Source limit: | 50000B |
Memory limit: | 1536MB |
Cluster: | Cube (Intel G860) |
Languages: | All except: ASM64 |
Resource: | (modified) Egyptian Olympiad in Informatics ( EOI ) 2009, August 14 - 21, Cairo |