RMQSQ - Range Minimum Query
You are given a list of N numbers and Q queries. Each query is specified by two numbers i and j; the answer to each query is the minimum number between the range [i, j] (inclusive).
Note: the query ranges are specified using 0-based indexing.
Input
The first line contains N, the number of integers in our list (N <= 100,000). The next line holds N numbers that are guaranteed to fit inside an integer. Following the list is a number Q (Q <= 10,000). The next Q lines each contain two numbers i and j which specify a query you must answer (0 <= i, j <= N-1).
Output
For each query, output the answer to that query on its own line in the order the queries were made.
Example
Input: 3
1 4 1
2
1 1
1 2 Output: 4
1
hide comments
|
trumcspkkk6969:
2022-10-02 12:36:25
how to solve it ussing DSU by youssifgamal ?? too difficulty |
|
youssifgamal:
2022-08-18 03:31:44
how could we solve it using DSU?
|
|
linhthebest:
2022-05-19 13:03:48
+ Sprase table (0,12s, 11M): <snip>
|
|
wlguedes:
2022-05-11 02:48:15
Also possible to solve using disjoint set union (https://cp-algorithms.com/data_structures/disjoint_set_union.html#arpa) |
|
namvinhkhang:
2021-12-27 12:05:26
i keep getting WA on test 5 and have no ideas whats wrong
|
|
mr__abhilash:
2021-10-27 14:35:14
good question |
|
shofiqur_052:
2021-10-17 19:13:09
Algo - Segment tree
|
|
amit2808_:
2021-09-10 08:23:01
Yeah exactly Errichto's video on sparse table is excellent. Done with sparse table. |
|
moarvivek:
2021-07-23 15:05:08
Solved using Square Root Decomposition, Segment tree and Sparse Table. |
|
sayang992:
2021-06-03 05:52:01
0.13 sec using sparse table and 0.07 using segment tree. Using segment tree gives better result as Q<N here. Although answering query takes O(1) in sparse table but building it takes o(nlog(n)) so overal complexity is O(nlog(n) +Q) for sparse table. But for segment tree building the tree takes O(4n) and answering each query takes O(log(n)) so overall O(n+Qlog(n)). Since Q<N so segment tree gives better time. And for space no doubt segment tree is better as it takes linear space. So my sparse table took 13 MB and segment tree only 5.3 MB. So better use segment tree if query<Size of array.
|
| Added by: | Joshua Kirstein |
| Date: | 2014-10-18 |
| Time limit: | 3s |
| Source limit: | 50000B |
| Memory limit: | 1536MB |
| Cluster: | Cube (Intel G860) |
| Languages: | All |
RSS