Submit | All submissions | Best solutions | Back to list |
SEGSQRSS - Sum of Squares with Segment Tree |
Segment trees are extremely useful. In particular "Lazy Propagation" (i.e. see here, for example) allows one to compute sums over a range in O(lg(n)), and update ranges in O(lg(n)) as well. In this problem you will compute something much harder:
The sum of squares over a range with range updates of 2 types:
1) increment in a range
2) set all numbers the same in a range.
Input
There will be T (T <= 25) test cases in the input file. First line of the input contains two positive integers, N (N <= 100,000) and Q (Q <= 100,000). The next line contains N integers, each at most 1000. Each of the next Q lines starts with a number, which indicates the type of operation:
2 st nd -- return the sum of the squares of the numbers with indices in [st, nd] {i.e., from st to nd inclusive} (1 <= st <= nd <= N).
1 st nd x -- add "x" to all numbers with indices in [st, nd] (1 <= st <= nd <= N, and -1,000 <= x <= 1,000).
0 st nd x -- set all numbers with indices in [st, nd] to "x" (1 <= st <= nd <= N, and -1,000 <= x <= 1,000).
Output
For each test case output the “Case <caseno>:” in the first line and from the second line output the sum of squares for each operation of type 2. Intermediate overflow will not occur with proper use of 64-bit signed integer.
Example
Input: 2 4 5 1 2 3 4 2 1 4 0 3 4 1 2 1 4 1 3 4 1 2 1 4 1 1 1 2 1 1 Output: Case 1: 30 7 13 Case 2: 1
Added by: | Chen Xiaohong |
Date: | 2012-07-11 |
Time limit: | 1.106s |
Source limit: | 50000B |
Memory limit: | 1536MB |
Cluster: | Cube (Intel G860) |
Languages: | All except: ASM64 |
hide comments
|
|||||||||
2014-08-24 22:55:23 mark03
AC in first! However I think test cases are very weak... |
|||||||||
2014-07-02 01:03:09 anonymous
cake walk...AC without lazy propagation...:) Last edit: 2014-07-02 01:04:02 |
|||||||||
2014-06-04 19:12:30 GURVINDER SINGH
Got wa for printing case #%d :( silly me :p |
|||||||||
2013-04-23 16:38:39 Ashwin. K
um. Test cases are very weak. Consider adding a testcase similar to 1 6 2 3 3 3 3 3 3 0 1 3 2 2 1 2 |
|||||||||
2012-07-11 22:01:53 Chen Xiaohong
Thanks! This is now fixed. Note also that "x" can be 0 for the set operation (it's -1000 <= x <= 1000). Also note that increments can happen after sets, and sets can happen after increments. Rejudged after fixing this also in the dataset. Last edit: 2012-07-13 20:29:52 |
|||||||||
2012-07-11 22:01:26 Buda IM (retired)
I don't think input example is correct. You have 5 queries, but Q=4 |