Submit | All submissions | Best solutions | Back to list |
GCJ2012C - Recycled Numbers |
Do you ever become frustrated with television because you keep seeing the same things, recycled over and over again? Well I personally don't care about television, but I do sometimes feel that way about numbers.
Let's say a pair of distinct positive integers (n, m) is recycled if you can obtain m by moving some digits from the back of n to the front without changing their order. For example, (12345, 34512) is a recycled pair since you can obtain 34512 by moving 345 from the end of 12345 to the front. Note that n and m must have the same number of digits in order to be a recycled pair. Neither n nor m can have leading zeros.
Given integers A and B with the same number of digits and no leading zeros, how many distinct recycled pairs (n, m) are there with A ≤ n < m ≤ B?
Limits
1 ≤ T ≤ 55
A and B have the same number of digits.
1 ≤ A ≤ B ≤ 2000000.
Are we sure about the output to Case #4?
Yes, we're sure about the output to Case #4.
Input
The first line of the input gives the number of test cases, T. T test cases follow. Each test case consists of a single line containing the integers A and B.
Output
For each test case, output one line containing "Case #x: y", where x is the case number (starting from 1), and y is the number of recycled pairs (n, m) with A ≤ n < m ≤ B.
Example
Input: 4 1 9 10 40 100 500 1111 2222 Output: Case #1: 0 Case #2: 3 Case #3: 156 Case #4: 287
Added by: | Ruslan Sennov |
Date: | 2012-04-15 |
Time limit: | 1.050s |
Source limit: | 50000B |
Memory limit: | 1536MB |
Cluster: | Cube (Intel G860) |
Languages: | All except: ASM64 |
Resource: | GCJ2012 |
hide comments
|
|||||
2020-04-12 11:57:49
Don't use strings. |
|||||
2013-05-15 17:32:15 Priyanka Kumari
very easy question!!! :) |
|||||
2013-05-14 07:17:23 Ashhar Jawaid
nice problems :) HINT : Don't use strings :D |
|||||
2013-03-20 15:49:43 raunakrocks
gud1 AC!! :P |
|||||
2012-05-20 18:31:41 Sidharth Gupta
@NIKHIL: yes its correct. |
|||||
2012-05-20 06:43:30 Ice_Bolt
is the output for case 4 true. |
|||||
2012-04-19 03:34:08 Sidharth Gupta
at first i was surprised with the time that my code takes but now i realize that i did save on the operations and unnecessary checks :) |
|||||
2012-04-19 03:34:08 Rishi Mukherje
Hendrik: Let me see if I can optimize it or not. But I am quite sure, you or numerix will surely do it. :) |
|||||
2012-04-19 03:34:08 hendrik
Rishi: On GCJ you got 8 minutes to solve this one. Here 9s on a pretty low computer. Challenging, isnt it? Not sure whether Python can make it here. |
|||||
2012-04-19 03:34:08 Ruslan Sennov
2Rishi: you have enough possibilities to run faster |