| Submit | All submissions | Best solutions | Back to list |
APLUSB2 - A plus B |
Given 2 integers, A and B, find their sum. Beware: There are no limits on A and B
Input
Two integers up to 100000 digits in length
Output
Output their sum
Example
Input: 1 4 Output: 5
| Added by: | Saravannan Shaan |
| Date: | 2009-04-09 |
| Time limit: | 1s-60s |
| Source limit: | 50000B |
| Memory limit: | 1536MB |
| Cluster: | Cube (Intel G860) |
| Languages: | All except: C99 ERL JAVA JS-RHINO NODEJS PERL6 PYTHON RUBY VB.NET |
| Resource: | Classic |
hide comments
|
|||||
|
2012-10-07 20:49:24 Vrian7
The problem not this outlined complete, there are negative numbers. be careful... |
|||||
|
2011-07-29 16:20:44 Lomby Whitetail
Could the numbers be within the program? Or do they have to be issued through input? (I'm using a Cray XM-P for these programming excersises, and the only way to do it is in it's assembly. The simpler the better) |
|||||
|
2010-11-07 15:23:34 CHICO_PEPSI
place someone tell me if you can RECEIVE numbers with signs for entrances, help me in this thanks |
|||||
|
2010-01-01 17:04:27 nishat farhan
is it possible to receive 100000 digits number in an array having 100001 elements? is it possible? or do i have to use dynamic memory allocation? and at last but not least, all two integers are positive, aren't those? any chance of having negative integers in test cases? |
|||||
|
2009-04-18 13:42:58 numerix
I would prefer it to open it again for python/ruby/java. As it is in tutorial section it gives no points anyway and it would be a real task in those languages to get it faster. |
|||||
|
2009-04-16 23:30:53 Saravannan Shaan
Aww, didn't realize PYTH/RUBY could process huge numbers as ints. C++ users actually had to use strings. |
|||||
|
2009-04-16 23:30:53 SALVO
oh wow....a difference of 20 secs between the C/C++ and PYTHON ..i didn't expect such a large differnce only due to I/O :) Last edit: 2009-04-14 16:08:37 |
|||||
|
2009-04-16 23:30:53 Saravannan Shaan
Any suggestions as to what I should put the time limit at? I rejudged yours and it passed now! =) Edit: For now it's at 60 seconds for the last case and 3 seconds for everything else. Last edit: 2009-04-13 23:55:35 |
|||||
|
2009-04-16 23:30:53 SALVO
You should increase the time limit for other languages (because their I/O is much slower). Last edit: 2009-04-13 08:30:00 |
|||||
|
2009-04-16 23:30:53 Saravannan Shaan
I guess I should've highlighted "no limits" =) Just wanted to let people think a bit. |
|||||
RSS