SQRMINSUM - Minimum Sum
Suppose you have a list of integers, and a move is defined as taking one of the integers from the list and replacing it with its square root, rounded down to the nearest integer.
Given an integer l and an integer k, start with the array [1, 2, 3 ... l] and find the minimal sum of the array after k moves.
Example
For l = 5 and k = 2, the output should be squareRoots(l, k) = 10.
We start with [1, 2, 3, 4, 5].
After square rooting 5 to get [1, 2, 3, 4, 2] and then square rooting 3 to get[1, 2, 1, 4, 2], we end up with a sum of 10.
Constraints
1 ≤ l ≤ 104
1 ≤ k ≤ 104
T=10000
Input
The first line contains T the number of test cases followed by 2*T lines containing l and k.
Output
For every test case, output one line containing an integer, i.e. the minimal possible sum.
Sample
Input: 2 5 2 2327 4895 Output: 10 10647
hide comments
misa_jovic06:
2021-08-04 15:06:08
rounded down to the nearest integer means that the square root for 7 is 2, not 3. (floor not round) costed me a lot of WA |
|
surajmall:
2020-01-03 08:03:41
Good question . Hint - No need of priority queue . just start thinking |
|
Ishan:
2018-04-19 07:22:18
O((k+l)*log(l)) with C++ STL's priority queue is sufficient, just be careful not to use computation heavy floating point calculating like sqrt() etc. |
|
nadstratosfer:
2017-11-17 08:10:50
Good time limit so you get to see what you're doing right. Turns out you can even pass with pure Python! Coding style makes all the difference. Great problem. |
|
saurabh:
2017-03-22 14:04:03
can anyone help me what to use instead of priority queue to avoid TLE
|
|
vengatesh15:
2017-03-07 09:59:06
easy one no need of priority queue .... |
|
avisheksanvas:
2016-07-12 08:49:07
It does indeed give the feel of a @vectar31 type problem ;)
|
|
jinxer:
2016-06-30 15:27:31
@vectar31 Bro you're an inspiration to me. Can you please give me Your History of submission" (Plaintext Version)"..So that i Could follow it!!!
|
|
iharsh234:
2016-06-30 08:19:11
why priority queue in pypy gives TLE?
|
|
Shubhransh Srivastav:
2016-06-25 10:14:14
fast i/o+priority queue...just managed to beat the time limit :) |
Added by: | Piyush Kumar |
Date: | 2016-06-10 |
Time limit: | 5s |
Source limit: | 50000B |
Memory limit: | 1536MB |
Cluster: | Cube (Intel G860) |
Languages: | All except: ASM64 GOSU JS-MONKEY |
Resource: | Standard Pro Co |